generelles

 
an dieser stelle möchte und darf ich ein statement eines kollegen und guten freundes-  
torsten gründl
 posten...

etwas generelles halt...

(nur in englisch verfügbar)

 

Warning: I wrote this document during smoker-pauses in an Internetworkshop and it is a first draft. I will rewrite and finish it when time permits. This is a bold statement. (Vincent Vega in Pulp Fiction)


Well, why are PWPs (Personal WebPages) useless?
Another approach: why are PWPs usefull?

Now, let's try to find out what the WWW is for. I'd say it's for information exchange. I think most of the surfers out there would agree. As far as I know, the original thought behind the WWW was for exactly that reason. You know, back at CERN...
Anyway, when I look at 99% of the homepages I come across, the same thing happens again and again. First, there is a welcome page. It hosts some more or less fitting graphics, as well as technical gimmicks like animated gifs, frames and many more or less interesting effects. Nettraffic ole!
(That's not plain bad, it helps pushing the hardware ahead) But I suppose enough has been said about Nettraffic, so I'm going to skip that section.


What's more important about these pages is the content. I am a firm believer that information itself is neither good nor bad - but as a human being I
often reel from the pages I visit in my naive search for quality. I don't refer to the uncountable XXX-Pages. They are part of our culture and they
stem directly from that very culture. They belong to the WWW like any other topic (science, music, history...). The point is Quality.

Of course, quality is a very personal matter, so everbody has his own terms in regards of defining quality for him/herself.
And there is the first problem: Most people I talked to don't even know what they like about a website. Furthermore, they also don't know why they like or don't like a particular feature. Most of the time, I get answers like: "Looks cool", "Dunno", "I just like it, I don't bother why"
Okay, it's not easy trying to find out the whys. It takes something most people don't like to do anymore: Working with information.
Look at our information landscape today: TV, Radio or Papers.
The information are presented in a very comfortable way: ready for consumption. It seems no longer necessary to process the information you receive. You just perceive them, and that's it. The brain is left out. The information go straight from your eyes to your memory. You don't ask questions about the information. Who presented it to me? Where are they from? What's the background? Can I bring them in conjunction with information I already possess?
And the same phenomenon is behind the most websites. There's just information for nothing. There is nothing behind. The only things behind a website are several thoughts about the presentation. And well, at least this field of the WWW gets ahead. A good presentation is important, and I think presentation has far outdone information itself. And that's not good. Look at a computer. As fast as the CPU may be, a slow graphics adapter cuts down the performance. It's the same with the WWW. As long as only one part of it goes ahead, there will never be a further evolution and the WWW will get stuck in its present state. Happened to the tv years ago.

So, why are PWPs useless?